20.000+ Bungalows 1.000+ Appartments

Search : Homes, Penthouse, Farmhouse etc.

Property Features

Here you can explain about property features.
  • Low Budget

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Penthouse

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Natural Light

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Public Transport

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Eco Friendly

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Fire Proof

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Nearby Store

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

  • Secured

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

    We have Delivered

    1500

    Houses Build

    4150

    Rented House

    860

    Shops Build

    52

    On Progress

    Our Portfolio.

    A creative agency that believes in the power of creative ideas and great design.
    Showing posts with label heat. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label heat. Show all posts

    Monday, January 22, 2018

    2017 was hottest year on record

    The year 2017 was the hottest year on record, as the image below illustrates.


    When determining which year was the hottest year, care should be taken to avoid bias due to temporary conditions such as the El Niño that was present in 2016 and the La Niña we're now experiencing now. Above image uses NASA land+ocean January 2012-December 2017 anomalies from 1951-1980, adjusted by 0.59°C to cater for the rise from preindustrial to 1951-1980, to calculate a linear trend that goes some way to smooth out variability due to El Niño/La Niña events. The trend shows that 2017 was significantly warmer than 2016.

    The trend also shows that 1.5°C above preindustrial was crossed back in 2016. This 1.5°C (or 2.7°F) was set at the Paris Agreement as a guardrail that was not to be crossed. The trend further shows that we've meanwhile crossed 1.6°C above preindustrial and we look set to cross the 2°C guardrail within years.


    Global warming has crossed 1.5°C / 2.7°F above preindustrial and looks set to cross 2°C / 3.6°F soon. Due to accelerating warming in the Arctic, that could happen within one or two years time, i.e. much faster than the trendlines below may suggest.


    Indeed, warming in the Arctic is taking place much faster than elsewhere, and the difference is accelerating. There's a huge danger that accelerating warming in the Arctic will speed up feedbacks such as:
    • huge amounts of methane getting released from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean;
    • melting of sea ice and permafrost causing more sunlight to get absorbed in the Arctic, as less sunlight gets reflected back into space;
    • changes to jet streams causing more extreme weather, in turn resulting in more emissions, such as due to wildfires;
    • and more.

    In conclusion, feedbacks could speed up global warming by much more than what may be suggested by above trends that look only at surface temperature of the atmosphere and that are based on previous data when such feedbacks had yet to become manifest.

    Add up the impact of all warming elements and, as an earlier analysis shows, the rise in mean global temperatures from preindustrial could be more than 10°C in a matter of years, as illustrated by the image below, which shows a much steeper rise.


    Particularly devastating feedbacks could result from changes regarding heat and carbon dioxide taken up by oceans. Oceans now take up 93.4% of global warming, as illustrated by the image below.


    As said, when looking at surface temperatures of the atmosphere, there will be bias due to El Niño/La Niña events. One way to smooth out such bias is by calculating trendlines over many years. Another way to compensate for such bias is to also look at ocean heat. In terms of ocean heat, the year 2017 stands at the top, as the left panel of above image illustrates. In 2016, El Niño caused relatively more heat to be present in the atmosphere and less in oceans, whereas the opposite occurred in 2017, contributing to the fact that in 2017 a record amount of ocean heat was recorded. Occurrence of El Niño/La Niña events over the years is visualized by the image below.



    One danger is that, in future, there will be more impact by El Niño events and less by La Niña events. A recent study concludes that as temperatures rise due to emissions by people, the frequency, magnitude and duration of strong El Niño events will increase.

    In addition to higher temperature peaks due to El Niño events, more heat could remain in the atmosphere as the rise in temperature in general causes greater ocean stratification, making that less heat gets absorbed by oceans, as discussed in several earlier posts. The image below depicts this feedback and further feedbacks mentioned above. Feedbacks are described in more detail at the feedbacks page.


    The situation is further illustrated by the danger assessment below.

    [ Danger Assessment, from earlier post ]
    Meanwhile, the Global Carbon Project projects a growth of 2% for the 2017 global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry (including cement production), compared to 2016 levels, as illustrated by image below.  

    The situation is dire and calls for comprehensive and effective action as described in the Climate Plan.


    Links

    • Climate Plan
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

    • Warming is accelerating
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/11/warming-is-accelerating.html

    • The Arctic is changing the Jet Stream - Why This Is Important
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-arctic-is-changing-the-jet-stream-why-this-is-important.html

    • 10°C or 18°F warmer by 2021?
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/04/10c-or-18f-warmer-by-2021.html

    • Abrupt Warming - How Much And How Fast?
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/05/abrupt-warming-how-much-and-how-fast.html

    • Feedbacks
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/feedbacks.html

    • Extinction
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

    • Methane Erupting From Arctic Ocean Seafloor
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/03/methane-erupting-from-arctic-ocean-seafloor.html

    • Warning of mass extinction of species, including humans, within one decade
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/02/warning-of-mass-extinction-of-species-including-humans-within-one-decade.html




    Friday, November 24, 2017

    Warming is accelerating


    Warming is accelerating. For some time, it has been warmer than the 1.5°C guardrail that the Paris Agreement promised should not be crossed. This conclusion follows from above analysis of NASA land+ocean data 1880-October 2017, adjusted by 0.59°C to cater for the rise from preindustrial and with a trend added that also indicates that the global temperature look set to cross the 2°C guardrail soon, with 2021 falling within the margins of the trend line.
    [ click on images to enlarge ]

    The trend line shows a strong and ominous direction upward. Nonetheless, the situation could be even more dire than this trend indicates, since some warming elements are not fully incorporated in these data.

    As an example, the NASA data look at the temperature at the surface of the oceans, which has increased strongly, as also illustrated by the image on the right.

    Much warming has also occurred below the sea surface, while there has been some cooling of the sea surface. Moreover, ocean heat has also increased strongly over the years, as the image below illustrates, and looks set to increase further.

    After all, what happens to oceans is important, as 93.4% of global warming currently goes into oceans.


    The fact that much warming is taking place below the sea surface could make that it gets overlooked. If much of this warming were to get transferred from the Arctic Ocean to the atmosphere over the next few years, then the temperature rise over the next few years could take an even sharper turn upward.

    The threat that warming below the sea surface is overlooked is highlighted by the image below, which shows huge warming of Arctic waters at selected locations near Svalbard.


    Above image focuses on temperatures at selected locations near Svalbard (see map below). In 1981-2011, temperatures were gradually falling by more than one degree Celsius over the period of measurement, i.e. from October 1 to November 23 (blue line), a fall that is in line with the change in seasons. Over this period in 2017, temperatures were 13.19°C or 23.77°F higher than in 1981-2011, while the temperature didn't seem to be falling (red line).


    How could these waters get a stunning 13.19°C warmer than two decades ago?

    Global warming did hit the North Atlantic hard, particularly along the track of the Gulf Stream all the way to the Arctic Ocean. This has translated into stronger winds along the track of the Gulf Stream, which are making that ever larger amounts of warm water are getting pushed from the North Atlantic to the Arctic Ocean.

    A temperature rise underneath the sea surface can be overlooked when merely monitoring the average surface temperature of the Arctic Ocean, especially when stronger winds have caused more evaporation, cooling down the water at the surface.

    [ 100% relative humidity (left) as jet stream moves over Arctic Ocean (right) ]
    Stronger winds, higher temperatures and the presence of more open water in the Arctic have all contributed to stronger rainfall in the Arctic. It looks like the rain did cause a freshwater lid to form at the surface of the Arctic Ocean, acting as an insulator and preventing transfer of ocean heat to the atmosphere. This also contributed to a colder atmosphere over the Arctic Ocean, i.e. colder than it would otherwise have been. At the same time, since less heat could escape from the Arctic Ocean to the atmosphere, this freshwater lid has resulted in warmer water, as is evident from the huge anomalies at the locations near Svalbard. The forecast below that Arctic will be 7.2°C or 12.96°F warmer than in 1979-2000 on December 3, 2017, illustrates just how warm the Arctic Ocean currently is.


    This freshwater lid has also made it easier for sea ice to form at the surface, as ice will form in freshwater as warm as just below 0°C (or 32°F), compared to salty seawater that must cool down to -2°C (or 28.4°F) before freezing. The seawater underneath the sea ice is warm enough to melt the ice from below, but the layer of freshwater at the surface acts as an insulator.

    There would have been less sea ice, had it not been for the rain resulting in this freshwater lid. Much of the freshwater lid did turn into sea ice in September 2017, as air temperatures came down below 0°Cs, and this sea ice similarly acted as an insulator, preventing transfer of heat from the Arctic Ocean to the atmosphere. Importantly, while much of the additional freshwater at the surface did turn into sea ice in 2017, this is only a temporary phenomenon, as no ice will form once the surface of the water will stay above 0°C, which looks imminent as temperatures keep rising.


    [ Cyclone carrying particulates into the Arctic Ocean ]
    Further sea ice loss means that less sunlight will get reflected back into space and will instead get absorbed by the Arctic, further accelerating warming in the arctic.

    Additionally, more heat is radiated from sea ice into space than from open water (feedback #23).

    Stronger cyclones can also bring more particulates into the Arctic Ocean, speeding up the demise of sea ice by darkening it when settling on ice, as illustrated by the image on the right.

    In conclusion, while the formation of the freshwater lid at the surface of the Arctic Ocean has been holding back the collapse of the sea ice, the delay of the collapse can only be a temporary one as temperatures keep rising. The Arctic Ocean is warming at accelerating speed and collapse of the sea ice looks imminent.

    [ click on image to enlarge ]

    Above images confirm the loss of the thicker sea ice over the past few years, while zero Arctic sea ice is within the margins of the trend line of the image on the right.

    Less sea ice will on the one hand make that more heat can escape from the Arctic Ocean to the atmosphere, but on the other hand the albedo loss and the additional water vapor will at the same time cause the Arctic Ocean to absorb more heat, with the likely net effect being greater warming of the Arctic Ocean.

    Another point to consider is latent heat, as discussed in earlier posts. The danger is illustrated by the image below, showing that heat threatens to destabilize methane hydrates at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. As the temperature of the Arctic Ocean keeps rising, more heat threatens to reach sediments that have until now remained frozen. Melting of the ice in these sediments then threatens to unleash huge eruptions of seafloor methane that has until now been kept locked up by the permafrost.

    The Buffer has gone, feedback #14 on the Feedbacks page
    Additionally, melting of permafrost on land can cause rapid decomposition of soils, resulting in releases of huge amounts of greenhouse gases, further accelerating warming in the Arctic, which in turn will result in more greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, water vapor) entering the Arctic atmosphere, more albedo changes, etc., in a vicious self-reinforcing cycle of runaway warming.


    Levels of CO2, CH4 an N2O have been rising rapidly since 1750, as above image shows. Methane levels have risen 257% since 1750.

    Did the rise in methane emissions slow down from 1999 to 2006?

    One explanation for the apparent slowdown is that, as temperatures kept rising, water vapor in the atmosphere increased accordingly (7% more water vapor for every 1°C warming), resulting in more hydroxyl that broke down more methane in the atmosphere since 1990. So, while the rise in methane levels appeared to slow down, methane emissions were actually continuing to increase, but as an increasingly large part of methane was decomposed by hydroxyl, this rise in methane was overlooked. In 2007, Arctic sea ice reached a record low, triggering more methane eruptions from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. While hydroxyl kept increasing, seafloor methane kept increasing faster, making that methane emissions increasingly started to overwhelm hydroxyl, resulting in a stronger rise in overall methane levels. In 2013, I estimated methane emissions at 771 Tg/y, whereas the IPCC's estimate was 678 Tg/y. The post estimated methane from hydrates and permafrost at 13% of total methane emissions, whereas the IPCC's estimate was a mere 1% of total methane emissions. - Sam Carana, Dec. 2017.



    [ click on images to enlarge ]
    The presence of methane is felt particularly strongly over the Arctic Ocean. Above images show high methane levels over the Arctic Ocean on December 2, 2017, when methane reached a peak level of 2771 ppb and on December 13 and 14, 2017, when peak levels as high as 2713 ppb were reached.

    Methane levels have been rising strongly since 2000 and this rise looks set to continue, as illustrated by the image on the right.

    There is also a danger that, as temperatures keep rising, the course of the ocean current near Svalbard could change, making that more heat will reach the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS), thus further warming up sediments there, resulting in huge amounts of methane erupting from the seafloor.

    Add up the impact of all warming elements and, as an earlier analysis shows, the rise in mean global temperatures from preindustrial could be more than 10°C in a matter of years, as illustrated by the images below.


    A 2°C rise in temperature alone is devastating, especially when considering that temperature peaks in history look to have been less high than previously thought, as concluded by a recent study in ocean paleotemperature. Therefore, a 10°C rise may well result in the warmest temperatures experienced on Earth. Moreover, the speed at which this rise could occur leaves little or no time for plants and animals to adapt, in contrast to historical climate swings that typically took many years to eventuate.


    The situation is dire and calls for comprehensive and effective action, as described in the Climate Plan.


    Links

    • Climate Plan
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

    • 10°C or 18°F warmer by 2021?
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/04/10c-or-18f-warmer-by-2021.html

    • Abrupt Warming - How Much And How Fast?
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/05/abrupt-warming-how-much-and-how-fast.html

    • Accelerating growth in CO₂ levels in the atmosphere
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/02/accelerating-growth-in-co2-levels-in-the-atmosphere.html

    • High methane levels over the Arctic Ocean on January 14, 2014
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2014/01/high-methane-levels-over-the-arctic-ocean-on-january-14-2014.html

    • Feedbacks
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/feedbacks.html

    • Extinction
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

    • Methane Erupting From Arctic Ocean Seafloor
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/03/methane-erupting-from-arctic-ocean-seafloor.html

    • Warning of mass extinction of species, including humans, within one decade
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/02/warning-of-mass-extinction-of-species-including-humans-within-one-decade.html


    Thursday, April 13, 2017

    The Methane Threat

    Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are accelerating. As illustrated by the image below, a linear trend hardly catches the acceleration, while a polynomial trend does make a better fit. The polynomial trend points at CO₂ levels of 437 ppm by 2026.


    EPA animation: more extreme heat
    This worrying acceleration is taking place while energy-related have been virtually flat over the past few years, according to figures by the EIA and by the Global Carbon Project. So, what makes growth in CO₂ levels in the atmosphere accelerate? As earlier discussed in this and this post, growth in CO₂ levels in the atmosphere is accelerating due to continued deforestation and soil degradation, due to ever more extreme weather events and due to accelerating warming that is making oceans unable to further take up carbon dioxide.


    Ocean warming is accelerating on the Northern Hemisphere, as illustrated by above image, and a warmer Atlantic Ocean will push ever warmer water into the Arctic Ocean, further speeding up the decline of the sea ice and of permafrost.

    [ click on images to enlarge ]
    Loss of Northern Hemisphere snow cover is alarming, especially in July, as depicted in above image. The panel on the left shows snow cover on the Northern Hemisphere in three areas, i.e. Greenland, North America and Eurasia. The center panel shows North America and the right panel shows Eurasia. While Greenland is losing huge amounts of ice from melting glaciers, a lot of snow cover still remains present on Greenland, unlike the permafrost in North America and especially Eurasia, which has all but disappeared in July.

    [ for original image, see 2011 AGU poster ]
    Worryingly, the linear trend in the right panel points at zero snow cover in 2017, which should act as a warning that climate change could strike a lot faster than many may expect.

    A recently-published study warns that permafrost loss is likely to be 4 million km² (about 1.5 million mi²) for each 1°C (1.8°F) temperature rise, about 20% higher than previous studies. Temperatures may well rise even faster, due to numerous self-reinforcing feedback loops that speed up the changes and due to interaction between the individual warming elements behind the changes.

    [ Arctic sea ice, gone by Sept. 2017? ]
    One of the feedbacks is albedo loss that speeds up warming in the Arctic, in turn making permafrost release greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane.

    Higher temperatures on land will make warmer water from rivers enter the Arctic Ocean and trigger wildfires resulting in huge emissions including black carbon that can settle on sea ice.

    Given the speed at which many feedbacks and the interaction between warming elements can occur, Arctic sea ice volume may decline even more rapidly than the image on the right may suggest.
    [ Record sea ice volume anomalies since end 2016 ]

    Ominously, sea ice volume anomalies have been at record levels for time of year since end 2016 (Wipneus graph right, PIOMAS data).

    As the Gulf Stream pushes warmer water into the Arctic Ocean, there will no longer be a large buffer of sea ice there to consume the heat, as was common for the entire human history.

    Moreover, forecasts are that temperatures will keep rising throughout 2017 and beyond.
    The Australian Bureau of Meteorology reports that seven of eight models indicate that sea surface temperatures will exceed El Niño thresholds during the second half of 2017.

    The image on the right, by the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts), indicates an El Niño that is gaining strength.

    For more than half a year now, global sea ice extent has been way below what it used to be, meaning that a huge amount of sunlight that was previously reflected back into space, is now instead getting absorbed by Earth, as the graph below shows.
    [ Graph by Wipneus ]
    Where can all this extra heat go? Sea ice will start sealing off much of the surface of the Arctic Ocean by the end of September 2017, making it hard for more heat to escape from the Arctic Ocean by entering the atmosphere.

    The Buffer has gone, feedback #14 on the Feedbacks page
    It looks like much of the extra heat will instead reach sediments at the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean that contain huge amounts of methane in currently still frozen hydrates.

    [ click on image to enlarge ]
    The danger is that more and more heat will reach the seafloor and will destabilize methane hydrates contained in sediments at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean, resulting in huge methane eruptions.

    As the image on the right shows, a polynomial trend based on NOAA July 1983 to January 2017 global monthly mean methane data, points at twice as much methane by 2034. Stronger methane releases from the seafloor could make such a doubling occur much earlier.

    Meanwhile, methane levels as high as 2592 ppb were recorded on April 17, 2017, as shown by the image below. The image doesn't specify the source of the high reading, but the magenta-colored area over the East Siberian Sea (top right) looks very threatening.


    We already are in the Sixth Mass Extinction Event, given the rate at which species are currently disappearing from Earth. When taking into account the many elements that are contributing to warming, a potential warming of 10°C (18°F) could take place, leading to a rapid mass extinction of many species, including humans.

    [ Graph from: Which Trend is Best? ]
    How long could it take for such warming to eventuate? As above image illustrates, it could happen as fast as within the next four years time.

    The situation is dire and calls for comprehensive and effective action, as described at the Climate Plan.


    Links

    • Climate Plan
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

    • Extinction
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

    • How much warming have humans caused?
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2016/05/how-much-warming-have-humans-caused.html

    • Accelerating growth in CO₂ levels in the atmosphere
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/02/accelerating-growth-in-co2-levels-in-the-atmosphere.html

    • An observation-based constraint on permafrost loss as a function of global warming, by Chadburn et al. (2017)
    http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate3262.html

    • Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition, by Janssens et al. (2010)
    http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n5/full/ngeo844.html

    • Methane Erupting From Arctic Ocean Seafloor
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/03/methane-erupting-from-arctic-ocean-seafloor.html

    • Warning of mass extinction of species, including humans, within one decade
    https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/02/warning-of-mass-extinction-of-species-including-humans-within-one-decade.html


    Wednesday, February 8, 2017

    Warning of mass extinction of species, including humans, within one decade


    [ click on images to enlarge ]
    On February 10, 2017, 18:00 UTC it is forecast to be 0.1°C or 32.1°F at the North Pole, i.e. above the temperature at which water freezes. The temperature at the North Pole is forecast to be 30°C or 54°F warmer than 1979-2000, on Feb 10, 2017, 18:00 UTC, as shown on the Climate Reanalyzer image on the right.

    This high temperature is expected as a result of strong winds blowing warm air from the North Atlantic into the Arctic.

    The forecast below, run on February 4, 2017, shows that winds as fast as 157 km/h or 98 mph were expected to hit the North Atlantic on February 6, 2017, 06:00 UTC, producing waves as high as 16.34 m or 53.6 ft.


    A later forecast shows waves as high as 17.18 m or 54.6 ft, as illustrated by the image below.


    While the actual wave height and wind speed may not turn out to be as extreme as such forecasts, the images do illustrate the horrific amounts of energy contained in these storms.

    Stronger storms go hand in hand with warmer oceans. The image below shows that on February 4, 2017, at a spot off the coast of Japan marked by green circle, the ocean was 19.1°C or 34.4°F warmer than 1981-2011.


    As discussed in an earlier post, the decreasing difference in temperature between the Equator and the North Pole causes changes to the jet stream, in turn causing warmer air and warmer water to get pushed from the North Atlantic into the Arctic.

    The image below shows that on February 9, 2017, the water at a spot near Svalbard (marked by the green circle) was 13°C or 55.3°F, i.e. 12.1°C or 21.7°F warmer than 1981-2011.

    [ click on images to enlarge ]
    Warmer water flowing into the Arctic Ocean in turn increases the strength of feedbacks that are accelerating warming in the Arctic. One of these feedbacks is methane that is getting released from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. Update: The image below shows that methane levels on February 13, 2017, pm, were as high as 2727 ppb, 1½ times the global mean at the time.

    [ click on image to enlarge, right image added for reference to show location of continents ] 
    What caused such a high level? High methane levels (magenta color) over Baffin Bay are an indication of a lot of methane getting released north of Greenland and subsequently getting pushed along the exit current through Nares Strait (see map below). This analysis is supported by the images below, showing high methane levels north of Greenland on the morning of February the 14th (left) and the 15th (right).



    The image below shows methane levels as high as 2569 ppb on February 17, 2017. This is an indication of ocean heat further destabilizing permafrost at the seafloor of the Laptev Sea, resulting in high methane concentrations where it is rising in plumes over the Laptev Sea (at 87 mb, left panel) and is spreading over a larger area (at slightly lower concentrations) at higher altitude (74 mb, right panel).


    This illustrates how increased inflow of warm water from the North Atlantic into the Arctic Ocean can cause methane to erupt from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean. Methane releases from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean have the potential to rapidly and strongly accelerate warming in the Arctic and speed up further feedbacks, raising global temperature with catastrophic consequences in a matter of years. Altogether, these feedbacks and further warming elements could trigger a huge abrupt rise in global temperature making that extinction of many species, including humans, could be less than one decade away.


    Without action, we are facing extinction at unprecedented scale. In many respects, we are already in the sixth mass extinction of Earth's history. Up to 96% of all marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species became extinct when temperatures rose by 8°C (14°F) during the Permian-Triassic extinction, or the Great Dying, 252 million years ago.

    During the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), which occurred 55 million years ago, global temperatures rose as rapidly as by 5°C in ~13 years, according to a study by Wright et al. A recent study by researchers led by Zebee concludes that the present anthropogenic carbon release rate is unprecedented during the past 66 million years. Back in history, the highest carbon release rates of the past 66 million years occurred during the PETM. Yet, the maximum sustained PETM carbon release rate was less than 1.1 Pg C per year, the study by Zebee et al. found. By contrast, a recent annual carbon release rate from anthropogenic sources was ~10 Pg C (2014). The study by Zebee et al. therefore concludes that future ecosystem disruptions are likely to exceed the - by comparison - relatively limited extinctions observed at the PETM.

    An earlier study by researchers led by De Vos had already concluded that current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than natural background rates of extinction and future rates are likely to be 10,000 times higher.

    from the post 2016 well above 1.5°C
    As above image shows, a number of warming elements adds up to a potential warming of 10°C (18°F) from pre-industrial by the year 2026, i.e. within about nine years from now, as discussed in more detail at the extinction page.


    Above image shows how a 10°C (18°F) temperature rise from preindustrial could be completed within a decade.

    https://sites.google.com/site/samcarana/climateplan
    The situation is dire and calls for comprehensive and effective action, as discussed in the Climate Plan.


    Links

    • Climate Plan
    http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/climateplan.html

    • Arctic Ocean Feedbacks
    http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2017/01/arctic-ocean-feedbacks.html

    • Extinction
    http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/p/extinction.html

    • How much warming have humans caused?
    http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2016/05/how-much-warming-have-humans-caused.html

    • Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction, De Vos et al. (2015)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159086

    • Anthropogenic carbon release rate unprecedented during the past 66 million years, by Zebee et al. (2016)
    http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v9/n4/full/ngeo2681.html

    • Evidence for a rapid release of carbon at the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, Wright et al. (2013)
    http://www.pnas.org/content/110/40/15908.full?sid=58b79a3f-8a05-485b-8051-481809c87076

    • RT America Youtube video
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSnrDRU6_2g

    • RT America Facebook video
    https://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica/videos/10154168391051366



    Warning of mass extinction of species, including humans, within one decade. The forecast for February 10, 2017, 18:00 UTC is that it will be 32.1°F or 0.1°C on North Pole, i.e. above freezing...
    Posted by Sam Carana on Wednesday, February 8, 2017

    Sora

    • Street :Lane Road 00
    • Person :Person
    • Phone :+012 345 678 910
    • Country :ENGLAND
    • Email :soratemplate@gmail.com

    Get in Touch

    Feel free to drop us a line to contact us

    Contact Form

    Name

    Email *

    Message *


    Feel free To Contact

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate dolores, quasi unde quisquam facilis at ullam aperiam similique dicta voluptatibus!

    • 3066 Stone Lane, Wayne, Pennsylvania.
    • +610-401-6021, +610-401-6022
    • soratemplate@gmail.com
    • www.soratemplates.com

    Pages